Projects: Riverside Quarter
AS
P0 agents Document Metadata QA
WELCOME
What you are about to see
1
The P0 agents the Asite team proposed — the foundations are complete.
2
The vision agents that put Asite ahead of every other CDE.
I will take your questions at the end.
STAGE 1 OF 5 · SET THE MAP
THE CDE AI QUADRANT · WHERE THIS ENDS

Two axes shape every CDE today

Up is governance. Right is agentic action. Every serious CDE sits somewhere on this map.
Governance →
Agentic action →
The open lane
permission-aware agentic CDE
Governed,
record-first
Agentic,
general construction
Point AI
features
The agents going live
Top-right, and uncontested. Permission-aware governance Aconex respects, agentic breadth past Procore, grounded in each project's permissions and government data.
ASITE Intelligence
Governed
Morning Briefing · Riverside Quarter · Tue 07:58
Scanning 20 open RFIs across 6 disciplines
Cross-referencing programme milestones against live risk feeds
Checking NEC4 compliance and EWN deadlines

3 need you

Flood alert vs groundworks Thursday: mitigation RFI drafted
Brent Civils (P7): change of control + overdue accounts
Submittal SUB-118 fails spec §07: reject or query

2 handled

Drawing S-204 rev C logged, rev B superseded
Metadata corrected on 3 uploads

1 to watch

Gateway 2 in 18 days: fire strategy still at P2
06:14
Trigger. The Environment Agency issues a Flood Alert for the River Brent, 300m from site.
EA Flood
Programme. Groundworks (Package 7) start Thursday, on the critical path.
WP7 · GroundworksMilestone M-G2↘ 2d programme risk
Primavera P6
Notify. Risk raised in the project channel; site manager tagged.
Teams
Draft. RFI-051 drafted: confirm dewatering and flood mitigation before groundworks.
CV · WP7PN001-RQ-CV-WP7-RFI-051⚠ EWN RequiredCE · Cl.60.1(2)
CDE
Connect. Brent Civils is the responsible party. Companies House shows a change of control and overdue accounts.
Companies House
Escalate. Brent Civils flagged to the commercial lead with the open exposure: VO-018, over by £32k.
ERP
Assemble. A cited evidence pack is ready: flood alert, programme extract, RFI draft, Companies House filing, VO-018.
Evidence pack
Two actions ready: send RFI-051, and flag Brent Civils to the commercial lead.
Policy: she drafts and notifies on her own; she must ask before sending externally or moving money.
AUDIT · You · 08:21 · RFI-051 (PN001-RQ-CV-WP7-RFI-051) sent · EWN raised, CE Cl.60.1(2) · Brent Civils flagged to commercial · evidence pack shared · sources: EA Flood, Primavera P6, Companies House, ERP · inside ACL
Recommended questions - please select
Answers come only from this project's record, with sources. Ask something outside it and she says she does not have it; she will not guess.

Document Metadata QA Live in QA · M4

Validates user-entered metadata against metadata the agent extracts from the document itself, then flags matches, mismatches and missing fields before save.

Input
Structural-Calcs-Block-A.pdf
Structural Calcs: Block A
Architectural
(empty)
Calculation
Extracting metadata from document content…
Validation summary · 4 fields checked
MATCHTitleStructural Calcs: Block A
MISMATCHDisciplineentered Architectural · extracted Structural
MISSINGRevisionheader reads Rev P3
MATCHDocument typeCalculation
PDF · DOC · DOCX · TXT · CSV · JSON · MD
Checked against ISO 19650 naming · auditable · saved only after you confirm

AI-assisted Workflow Design Live in QA · M4

Describe a process in plain English. The agent builds a visual workflow in the Asite designer, auto-assigning roles, ready to review, edit and deploy.

Describe your workflow
"When a contractor uploads an RFI, route it to the lead consultant for review. If it is not answered within 5 days, escalate to the project manager."
Interpreting intent, steps and conditions…
Generated workflow · Asite Workflow Designer
Start
Contractor uploads RFItrigger · RFI form
Review RFIassigned · Lead Consultant
Answered within 5 days?
Yes
Close RFInotify · Contractor
No · escalate
Escalateassigned · Project Manager
Roles auto-assigned · refine by chat · deploys as a standard Asite workflow

AI-powered Bid Evaluation Live in QA · M4

Reads every bidder's documents, summarises each submission, ranks on price, and compares any line item across bidders. No line-by-line manual review.

Input · 3 bidders, 9 documents
Bidder A · 3 files   Bidder B · 3 files   Bidder C · 3 files
Reading submissions and extracting pricing…
Price ranking
RankBidderTotal bid
1Bidder B£398,000
2Bidder A£420,000
3Bidder C£452,500
Bidder B submitted a complete bid for the concrete works package at £398,000. Lowest quote for reinforcement works, site supervision included.
Item comparison · "Reinforced Concrete: 200 m³"
BidderQuoted priceNote
Bidder B£96,000best price
Bidder A£110,000mid
Bidder C£124,500most expensive
Every figure traces back to the source document

WIR Quality & Relevance Validator Live in QA · M4

A pre-submission reviewer. Checks the WIR's content, documents and images against past approved WIRs, scores readiness and suggests fixes. Advisory, never blocking.

Input · WIR draft
Civil
Concrete pour: foundation
Attachments: pour-checklist.pdf · 2 images
Comparing against past approved WIRs…
Readiness assessment
62%MEDIUM
Likely to need rework if submitted now. Three fixes would move this to a high-confidence approval, based on patterns in approved civil WIRs.
FIXContentVague on cure time and slump test. Approved WIRs state both.
MISSINGDocumentsNo method statement attached. Expected for a foundation pour.
CHECKImagesOne image appears to show electrical conduit, not civil works.
Advisory only · you can still submit · learns from your approved WIRs

Form Generation Live in QA · M4

Describe a form in plain English (or upload a screenshot or PDF) and the agent builds it. Then modify it by chat: add fields, set validation, all as live edits.

Describe the form
"Create a contractor registration form with name, email, company, and document upload."
Inferring fields, types and validation…
Generated form · editable
⬆ Drag a file or browse · PDF, DOCX
Required fields and types inferred · chat edits apply instantly

Model validation (BIM) Live in QA · M4

Validates the federated model against ISO 19650 and your project standards, and raises an issue ticket for every clash, naming breach or missing attribute. Verified evidence, traceable to the standard.

Input
Block-A-STR.ifc · federated model
Checking the model against ISO 19650 and standards…
Validation result · issue tickets raised 3
TICKETNaming breach: 3 objects not ISO 19650 compliantTPF-01..03
TICKETRequired attribute "FireRating" missing on 12 elementsTPF-04
TICKETClash: structural beam vs MEP duct at Level 2TPF-05
PASSAll spaces classified and bounded
Checked against ISO 19650-2 naming convention ▾
ISO 19650-2: information containers shall follow the agreed naming convention (project · originator · volume/system · level · type · role · number). 3 objects use a non-conforming type code and were ticketed.
3D Repo modelISO 19650-2tickets created in Asite
Every finding traces to the standard and lands as a tracked issue

Golden-thread completeness Building Safety Act

For higher-risk buildings, the agent assembles the golden thread and checks it against the regulator's gateway requirements before submission, so gaps are closed early. An assisted submission against the regulator's process.

Input
Eastgate Tower · higher-risk building · Gateway 2
Checking the golden thread against gateway 2 requirements…
Gateway 2 readiness · 70% · 2 gaps
PRESENTFire strategyapproved C1
MISSINGStructural design packagenot in safety case
PRESENTChange control log
GAPCompetence declarations: 1 of 3 outstanding
Building Safety Act · gateway 2assisted submission
Assembled and checked against the regulator's requirements · close the gaps before you submit

Permission-aware answers Governed

The same question returns a different answer depending on who is asking. Identity, organisation and policy are checked before anything is retrieved, so each role sees only what it is allowed to.

Question
"What is the commercial risk on Riverside Quarter?"
Checking identity and permissions before retrieval…
Same question · different permission · different answer

Main Contractor · PM

FLAG Brent Civils (P12): accounts overdue, change of control
OVER Variation VO-018 over budget by £32k
Companies House · ERP · full project record

Subcontractor · Package 7

OK Your package is on track
Commercial detail and other packages are outside your permission
Your package record only
Identity and organisation checked first · each role sees only what it may · inside your ACL

Planning constraints Live public data Flagship agent

Upload a site polygon and the agent returns every planning constraint that applies, in seconds, as a cited evidence pack from authoritative public data. This is where data permissioning changes: external data enters under one governed permission model, inside your ACL.

Input
Site polygon · Riverside Quarter, Plot 4 boundary
Querying national planning data…
Planning evidence pack · assembled in 1.2s
CHECKConservation Area: Riverside CA
CHECKListed building within 50m: Grade II (Mill House)
CHECKFlood Zone 2: part of site
NOTEArticle 4 Direction in force
planning.data.gov.ukEnvironment Agency
Evidence pack ready: 4 cited findings, 2 sources, shareable. A 30-minute GIS check, in seconds.

Flood & environment Live public data

The agent watches authoritative environmental feeds for the site and surfaces alerts in the channel, interpreted against the project's own location and programme.

Input
Site · Riverside Quarter, Plot 4
Checking Environment Agency feeds…
Flood warning · just now
A flood warning has been issued for the River Brent, 300m from site, while groundworks are scheduled this week.
EA Flood Monitoring APIProgramme · groundworks this week
The signal matters because it is read against what the project already knows

Supply-chain due diligence Live public data Flagship agent

Every subcontractor is checked and watched against Companies House, so a wobbling supplier is flagged to the commercial lead before it becomes a programme problem.

Input
Subcontractor · Brent Civils Ltd (groundworks)
Checking Companies House filing history…
Companies House check
FLAGAccounts overdue: filed 47 days late
FLAGChange of control: 2 months ago
OKActive · no insolvency notices
Companies House
Watched continuously, not a one-off check

Ask the assistant Governed · white-label

A branded conversational front door to the agents. It answers from the governed record with sources, and nothing leaves Asite.

Asite Intelligence
Project assistant
White-label · branded to your client

RFI to resolution Cross-system · agentic

Not just an answer. The agent works across the record and your connected tools to move the task forward, the autonomous, end-to-end workflow the market is racing toward, run inside your ACL.

Input
RFI-042 · "Clarify rebar spacing at grid C3"
Working across systems…
Agent run · 5 steps
Read RFI-042 in the record
parsed question and grid reference
Asite record
Matched to drawing and spec
drawing S-204 · spec §03 20 00
Drawings
Drafted a response citing the clause
200mm centres, per spec
Asite Intelligence
Updated the linked programme task
review due date set
Programme (P6)
Notified consultant and contractor
email and channel message
Email · Teams
Asite recordDrawingsProgramme (P6)EmailTeams
cites spec §03 20 00cites drawing S-204
Proposed actions · awaiting approval
Send drafted RFI response to the lead consultant
Update the programme review date
It proposes, a person approves, then it executes · all inside your ACL · source owned by Asite

Submittal & spec review Cross-system · agentic Flagship agent

Reviews a submittal package against the specification and drawings, flags every discrepancy with a grounded citation, and compresses a review from hours to minutes.

Input
Submittal SUB-118 · Rebar · 6 documents
Comparing submittal against spec and drawings…
2 mintypically 3 to 4 hours of manual review
Review · 4 checks, 2 issues
PASSBar spacing 200mm matches drawingS-204
PASSConcrete grade C32/40 matches spec§03 30 00
FLAGCover to reinforcement: submittal 40mm vs spec 50mm§03 20 00
MISSINGMill certificates absent for 2 of 6 barsrequired
Every finding cites the source clause or drawing

Build your own agent Asite teams or clients · no code

Anyone on the Asite team — or any client — can build as many agents as they need, with no technical expertise. Describe an agent in plain English and it is composed for you, choosing the tools it needs. New tools, including UK Government data, connect in days, and every agent inherits them.

Describe the agent
"When a new subcontractor is added, run due diligence, check insurance expiry, and alert the commercial lead if anything looks risky."
Composing the agent and selecting tools…
Composed agent
TRIGGERSubcontractor added to a package
STEP 1Run Companies House due diligenceCompanies House
STEP 2Check insurance expiry in documentsDocument store
STEP 3If risk found, alert the commercial leadEmail
No platform redevelopment · runs inside your ACL
Connected tools · add a new one in days
Asite record
Drawings
Programme (P6)
Email
Teams
Cost
Companies House
Planning data
EA Flood
OS Places
EPC register
+ your tool
Blue tiles are live UK Government data, a layer hosted agents do not have

Portfolio risk radar Cross-system · agentic

One agent scans every project and combines the internal record with live Government data, a view no externally hosted agent can produce, because it has neither your full record nor live UK data.

Scanning projects and live external signals…
Portfolio risk · 3 projects
ProjectSignalsSourceRisk
Riverside QuarterFlood warning active; subcontractor accounts overdueEA · Companies HouseHIGH
Eastgate TowerGateway 2 documents incompleteAsite · BSAMEDIUM
Harbour ViewNo active external risks·LOW
Internal record plus live Government data · the leapfrog a hosted file agent cannot make

Cost & commitment Once connected · ERP

Connect the layer to your ERP and every variation and RFI can be reconciled against committed cost and budget, with overruns flagged before they land.

Once we connect the intelligence layer to your ERP (SAP S/4HANA or Oracle Fusion), this agent can do things like this.
Input
Variation VO-018 · Block A reinforcement
Reconciling against committed cost in your ERP…
Cost impact · VO-018
COMMITTEDSpent and committed to date£4.62m
THIS VOVariation VO-018+ £128k
OVERBudget remaining £96kover by £32k
SAP S/4HANAAsite record
Committed cost read from your ERP · the overrun flagged before it lands · inside your ACL

Find across repositories Once connected · Documents

Connect the layer to your document stores and it can find the latest approved version of anything, wherever it lives, and bring it into the record.

Once we connect the intelligence layer to your document stores (SharePoint, Box, Google Drive), this agent can do things like this.
Ask
"Latest approved fire strategy for Block A"
Searching SharePoint, Box and Google Drive…
Found · latest approved
APPROVEDFire-Strategy-BlockA-Rev-C.pdfSharePoint
SUPERSEDEDRev B still sitting in Boxflagged
LINKEDRev C pulled into the Asite record
SharePointBoxGoogle Drive
One answer across every repository · permissions respected · inside your ACL

Portfolio benchmark Once connected · Data

Connect the layer to your data platform and it can benchmark cycle times and patterns across every project, not just this one.

Once we connect the intelligence layer to your data platform (Snowflake or Databricks), this agent can do things like this.
Metric
RFI response time · this project vs portfolio
Querying the portfolio in Snowflake…
Benchmark · RFI response time
THIS PROJECTAverage RFI response6.2 days
PORTFOLIOAverage across 14 projects4.1 days
BOTTOM QUARTILESubmittal rejections 18% vs 11%
Snowflakeportfolio data
Patterns across every project · a portfolio view, not a single record
Overview: Start with Play the morning to watch the coworker handle a real overnight event. The full walkthrough comes next.
Illustrative prototype. P0 agents live in QA at Milestone 4. Government data uses public APIs available today. Representative data shown. Asite Intelligence
Liv, your Asite Intelligence guide LIVE

Now ask Liv anything

You've seen the roadmap. Liv has the full plan, the trade-offs and the competitive picture in her head. Ask her whatever you'd ask in the room.

The roadmap · 6 months
Twelve weeks in, six months to an intelligence layer live in Asite.
M1
Contract initiation
M2
Architecture
M3
Integration dev
4
M4
MVP to QA
5
M5
Live MVP rollout
6
M6
Advanced use cases
7
M7
Agent Builder live
You are here · M4 of 7
Source code lands in your repo at M5 — what we build runs inside your own Azure, you own it.
Worked example · £/m²
Two schools, £1,500 gap. The record explains the real £350.
Raw gap (£4,700 vs £3,200/m²)£1,500
– Region & labour−£500
– Ground conditions−£350
– Planning & heritage−£300
The addressable why£350
Public data makes it fair. The delivered-project record Asite holds makes it true.
Asite Intelligence LIVE
Hi, I'm Liv. Ask me about the Asite 6-month agentic roadmap.
Tap to talk